Showing posts with label restructure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label restructure. Show all posts

Saturday, July 12, 2014

Loan Waiver Culture

My Opinion And Observation on trend of Loan waiver, compromise, restructure to conceal Non Performing assets----
Since there is no full proof and time bound legal machinery which can ensure recovery of loan from defaulters and since there is intolerable and unrealistic pressure for achievement of target fixed for lending, bankers think it better and wise to lend recklessly and carelessly  and let it become NPA and then go for either evergreening or writing off of loan or sacrificing some amount and then relending . In this way they achieve the target of lending as well as that of recovery and in return they not only get admiration from bosses but also get early elevation in career. 


But the said trend of playing with assets gives alarming signals for existence and future of public sector banks. Some banks have given i.e. delegated huge volume of powers to Branch manager , majority of whom are neither well versed in principles and processing of loan sanction nor they do know how to monitor and safeguard the interest of the bank and nor they know the processes applicable for recovery of dues from defaulters. Power to sanction loan and then power to compromise with borrowers and extension of heavy discount by same person will give ample scope of corruption.

Branch Manager and Regional Head or Zonal Head  think it better to adopt evergreening process to survive and to remain in good books of their bosses . This is why volume of frauds and stressed assets in banks is going out of control day by day. None can stop until and unless the culture of banking is entirely changed and rejuvenated. Inexperienced and incapable officials have become Head of branch or the Region and they simply learn easy tools to survive and get rid of torturous treatment from bosses. Very few persons are really serious about interest of the organization they serve. And it is also true that such devoted persons are rejected and shunted lot in the banks. None can deny this bitter reality of public sector banks


 Banks are taking suicidal steps to reduce load of stressed assets. They are subjected to frequent tortures by their bosses. Finance Minister pulls CMD, CMD rebukes General Manager and GM then humiliates their juniors. In result it sends terror wave below the line. To overcome this, many banks, you may say almost all PS banks have framed a policy of giving heavy discount to loan defaulters on repayment of loan.  They are offering heavy discounts to persons who repay the loan at the cost of investors and depositors of banks.

Bankers are ready to write off and sacrifice huge volume of loan to reduce volume of stressed and bad assets. They have given huge power to head of branches to sanction the loan and when loan goes bad, they can compromise with defaulters giving huge discounts. Obviously , banks are first distributing bank's fund as charity in  form of loan and then sacrifice bank loan either by write off or by giving huge discount. Their steps will prove to be disaster in long run. They are digging grave for them. Culture of repayment has already been adversely and critically affected by three decades long wrong policies adopted by previous governments of Congress Party. Such unhealthy discounts and waiver of loan will finally end repayment culture and people will learn not to repay the dues and wait for loan waiver scheme. There are tax consultants in India who guide black money earner businessmen how to evade taxes in nexus with IT or ST officials. In short run, people may find brokers in all bank areas who will in nexus with bank officials help in getting sanction of  loan from branches of banks and then another team or same team of brokers will help in getting rid of repayment or getting heavy discounts and that too in collusion with bank officials of the branch concerned or bank concerned.

For last three decades politicians of the country used banks for their political advantage. Politicians like Devi Lal and V P Singh master minded loan waiver culture and then other politicians followed the suit for their political advantage. These politicians not only advocated loan waiver culture but also built pressure on banks to grant fresh loan to loan defaulters so that total credit of the bank does not fall short of allotted targets. Politicians came out with loan write off scheme in nexus with RBI and now management of banks are themselves indulged in such suicidal acts in some form or the other. 

Now only God can save these Public Sector banks. Top officials of PS banks are taking such suicidal steps to brighten their own career. But the million dollar question is who has given them right to sacrifice bank's money which is public property. Is there anyone who can stop it? It is public money which is being sacrificed by selfish bankers to make their own wealth and own career.

If you are a banker or an official to regulate and monitor banks  or an auditing or inspecting official or an investor in bank shares ,you should  read the article which appeared recently in Reuters,
There is an established practice in almost all coooperative banks to keep the loan account EVERGREEN. To Illustrate and to make it more clear :   say a bank  disburse a loan of  Rs10000 to a farmer and the account become overdue after a year or two , the same bank sanction a loan of Rs20000 or Rs.30000 which enable farmer to repay first loan and avail only extra loan . In the same way banks use to sanction inflated loans to same defaulting borrowers year after year which keep the account always standard.

During the course of time, public sector banks have also learnt the art of keeping  the loan account evergreen. They have many tools in their clever brain to keep assets of bank always standard.

First and foremost is the  restructuring or rephasing of loan on flimsy ground and second to give additional loan to repay overdue loan.

If even after such self deceptive acts ,banks fail to keep the account in standard category they feed wrong information in CBS system so that such accounts may not be identified as NON performing asset in the exercise of identification of the system driven NPA.

Then they try to prevail upon team of auditors to help them in hiding bad assets from the balance sheet.

Next better option is to sell the bad loan to ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY known as ARCs at discounted rate without caring for loss bank has to suffer and ultimately investor has to suffer by such unhealthy actions.

Lastly they have option to write off the loan or sacrifice major portion of overdue loan which again adversely affects the bottomline of the bank and is indirectly a cheating treatment with investors and employees whose earnings depend on health of bank.

Bankers seldom make efforts to strike at the root cause of rising volume of bad assets. And neither owners of banks have got time to nip in the bud.
Prudent bankers who are apt in art of keeping assets evergreen and standard , who know the art of managing auditors and concerned officials at various offices may only become ED or CMD of a bank .One who preach sermons to others but do not follow, one who can deliver good speech , who can manage boss and keep him happy by hook or by crook may only get the chance in promotion.

In our country none is bothered of real health of the system, real health of the organization and real welfare of common men ,but everyone is busy is dressing and decorating the outer appearance attractive .And this is the root cause that an institution or a country all of a sudden lands in unmanageable crisis.


Only CBI inquiry and deep rooted investigation of what is going on in these banks for last several years and then punishment to those who propagated bad culture of serving self interest at the cost of bank’s interest may only help in correcting the evil culture. 

Otherwise government will continue to cry and bank officials will continue to put lame excuses for growing sickness and weakness in the system. They may change the name of policy or frame new policy but fail to executing them in true spirit. I can say that Old wine in new bottle will continue to rule and ruin the country as well as these banks.

Ultimately bank staff, depositors, investors and finally Indian citizen will face the losses in form of taxes or deficiencies in services..

Sunday, June 29, 2014

Restructure Public Sector Banks

Building a Better India – Part 10: Restructuring banking system-Money Life
Small borrowers immediately have their collaterals confiscated on default, but big industrial borrowers don't seem to suffer the same fate

The state of India's banking system does not garner as much attention as it should. With our layers upon layers of public sector banks and lending practices, our banking system is heading into troubled waters, if something drastic is not done soon.
You may also read following important information in links given below
Know About DICGC And Savings Deposits
Read About Public Provident Fund Scheme

India Does Not Need Honest Officers

Material For Promotion Tests

Important News For Mobile Users

Avoid Giving PAN Details for Tatkal Reservation

रक्ताल्पता या खून की कमी (ANAEMIA ) -And Benefits Of भिंडी -

Know About Savings Deposits And DICGC Scheme

Why Not 25 % Wage Hike

Private Banks Double Manpower In 5 Years

SBI Average Salary More Than ICICI


Consolidation of public sector banks

All 26 public sector banks including State Bank of India (SBI) and it’s subsidiaries and associates should be merged and consolidated into 6 Banks as under:-

  A.   Central India Bank Ltd. 
           
  B.   North India Bank Ltd.

  C.   South India Bank Ltd. 
              
  D.  West India Bank Ltd.

  E.   East India Bank Ltd.       
          
  F.  North Eastern India Bank Ltd.

The initial cost of such consolidation will pay back handsomely in no time, in terms ofbetter efficiency, lesser operational costs and scale of operations besides other benefits.

RBI's core functions:

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has to perform multiple and numerous functions single handily and is extremely overburdened despite having one full time Governor and four Deputy Governors.

It may be better if some of its following secondary functions are devolved upon a separate banking & financial regulatory authority.

a. Regulation and control of regional rural banks.

b. Co-operative rural banks.

c. Regulation and control of chit fund and Nidhi companies, money circulating and mobilising schemes.

d. Regulation of micro finance companies and gold finance companies.

e. Regulation and control of non banking finance companies etc.

Massive irregularities in disbursement of loans by PSU banks

Financial Express reported in March that for every rupee lent by banks in India, 13 paise have turned into bad loans. No strict actions seem to be forthcoming for the known defaulters or the bankers. Especially considering that small borrowers immediately have their collaterals confiscated on default, but big industrial borrowers don't seem to suffer the same fate.

The various and scattered laws on banks and financial institutions as under should be consolidated in to two laws namely INDIAN BANKING ACT  and  INDIAN FINANCIAL INSTITUITIONS ACT, with adequate and effective provisions, and strict rules for quick recovery of bad or sticky loans.

1. Banker’s books evidence act 1891

2. Agriculturist loans act 1884

3. Banking regulation act 1949
           
4. IDBI bank act 1964

5. State bank of INDIA act 1955    
     
6. SBI (subsidiary banks) act 1

7. State bank of Hyderabad act 195 
   
8. State associated banks act 1

9. Exim bank act 1981       
                 
10. National housing bank act

11. Regional rural banks act 1976    
      
12. SIDBI Act 198

13. Banking Companies acquisition and transfer act 1970/1980

14. State financial corporation act 1951

15. Unit trust of INDIA act

16. Recovery of Debts due to Banks & Financial Institution Act, 1993

17. Securitization and Reconstruction of financial Assets and Enforcement rules 2002

The nexus between bankers and businessmen needs to be broken or atleast addressed, Moneylife has written before about how rising NPAs are affecting the solvency of India's prestigious public sector banks. For a more detailed view on this specific issue please read our previous article here.
Link Money Life
RBI flags stability risks for banks as asset quality still a concern In Financial Stability Report, RBI says banks weighed down by high inflation, and slow domestic growth--LiveMint

Mumbai: Risks to the stability of Indian banks have increased in the six months ended 30 March as asset quality stress remains high and lenders are weighed down by the slow pace of economic expansion and high inflation, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said in its bi-annual Financial Stability Report released on Thursday. 

The central bank predicts that gross non-performing assets (NPAs) of lenders will remain steady at 4-4.1% by the end of fiscal 2015, compared to 4% at the end of March 2014. However, there are chances that the NPA ratio could increase further to 5.5% if macroeconomic conditions deteriorate. The central bank also highlighted the risk of increased lending by insurance companies. RBI has assumed a baseline scenario of 5.5% economic growth in 2014-15, which could drop to 3.6% in case of “medium stress”, and to 1.7% in case the stress is severe. 

Wholesale prices are assumed to rise 5.3% under the baseline assumption, but could rise more rapidly by 7.5% and 10.7% in case of medium and severe stress, according to RBI. Indian banks, particularly state-controlled lenders, are facing rising loan defaults as the nation’s economy expanded near the slowest pace in a decade amid high interest rates, making it difficult for borrowers to repay loans. The economy grew 4.7% in the year ended 31 March, after expanding 4.5% in the previous fiscal, the slowest in a decade. 

The increase in defaults has, in turn, crimped profits of the banks and increased their need to boost capital. State-run banks are more vulnerable than their private sector counterparts. The stress tests indicated that under a severe stress scenario, gross NPAs for public sector banks may rise to 6.1% by March 2015 from 4.6% in March 2014, the RBI report said. A stress test of sectoral credit risk conducted by RBI revealed that the iron and steel sector is expected to register the highest NPAs of around 6.7% by March 2015, followed by the construction and engineering industry. 

Though the stress on banks has eased, NPAs continue to pose a “systemic risk” to the banking sector, said Dhananjay Sinha, head of research at Emkay Global Financial Services Ltd. “The government needs to take steps to address the infrastructure issue and unless the bottlenecks are cleared, asset quality will not improve. Banks are clearly not seeing any improvement on the ground.” 

However, there are some indications that corporates with stressed balance sheets could see some relief in the coming months as companies take advantage of improved sentiment in the capital market to raise equity to cut their debt. This, in turn, will benefit banks. Indian companies are increasingly resorting to qualified institutional placements to raise funds. At least four companies have raised about Rs.10,390 crore through share sales to qualified investors since late May, when the new government took over, according to Mint’s estimates. 

But new risks are emerging. Highlighting the increased lending by insurance companies, RBI said that any regulatory arbitrage needs to be plugged and a coordinated approach is needed to monitor exposures of large borrowers. “This is an issue of increasing overlaps between regulatory domains. For instance, banks may have loan exposure to the same companies which raise debt from insurance firms. 

There is potential for companies to engage in “regulatory arbitrage”, arising from, for example, tighter operating environment for banks under Basel III norms, which are not yet applicable to insurance companies,” said Saugata Bhattacharya, chief economist at Axis Bank. RBI, however, said that the quantum of lending by insurance companies, which stood at Rs.88,870 crore at the end of March, is less than 5% of the assets under management. 

RBI also remains mindful of the enormous need for capital from state-owned banks. “India’s financial sector remains stable, although public sector banks face challenges in coming quarters in terms of their capital needs, asset quality, profitability and more importantly, their governance and management processes,” said RBI governor Raghuram Rajan in the foreword to the report. 

RBI calculations project the total capital requirement of public sector banks at Rs.4.15 trillion between now and March 2019 when the new international banking capital norms—Basel III norms—are set to be applied in India. Of the total capital required by state-owned banks, Rs.90,000 crore will have to come from the government if it intends to maintain its current stake in these banks. 

“Amidst the government’s fiscal position constraints, PSBs’ (public sector banks) ability to raise additional capital from the market depends on the conditions in capital markets and the ‘market perception’ of their relative strengths and weaknesses,” noted the RBI report, while highlighting the undervaluation of public sector banks in the market. Private sector banks have commanded a stronger valuation in the market. For instance, the one-year forward price-to-book ratio of ICICI Bank Ltd is 2.02, while that of State Bank of India is 1.54. 

The price-to-book ratio is a valuation measure commonly used for banks. RBI argued in its report that an implicit government guarantee should allow the valuations of public sector banks to broadly converge with industry averages. “To maintain its majority share in banks and infuse close to Rs.1 trillion, the government does not have much of an option but to float a holding company for banks. 

This company will hold all banks and raise money on a portfolio basis. Government can then dilute the stake in this company as required,” said Abizer Diwanji, National Leader, Financial Services, Ernst and Young India. The report, which includes the results of a stress test conducted on banks, showed that the present level of provisions made by scheduled commercial banks may “fall short in meeting the expected losses under such a (extreme but plausible) scenario”. 

While the capital adequacy ratio of banks improved to 12.9% in March 2014 from 12.7% in September 2013, in case of a severe stress, this ratio could fall to 10.6%, RBI said. The report also noted that as the liquidity capital requirements (LCR) under Basel III norms progressively increase, RBI may consider it desirable to further reduce the SLR (statutory liquidity ratio) requirement for banks from the current 22.5%. “Given the roadmap for fiscal consolidation to reduce fiscal deficit to 3% of GDP (gross domestic product) by 2016-17, any decline in incremental availability of government securities may not thus impinge on SLR and LCR requirements,” said the report. 

Rajan added that while India remains committed to implementing global regulatory reforms, priorities may differ as the Indian financial system faces a different set of challenges as compared with those jurisdictions which faced financial or banking crisis. Meanwhile, addressing the prevailing macro economic situation in India, RBI said that the moderation in consumer price inflation and the reduction in twin deficits (fiscal deficit and current account deficit) have provided some breather. “However, adverse growth-inflation setting obtained over the last two years which continue to affect saving investment dynamics, poses a major challenge,” said RBI, while adding that with the formation of a stable government, the prospects of recovery appear bright. 

“A strong push to implementing policy is expected to provide the necessary impetus to the investment cycle,” said RBI. 

Read more at: http://www.livemint.com/Money/ZjmdpKy0DnZUboKpkGDxAM/RBI-says-economic-growth-inflation-banks-asset-quality-st.html?utm_source=copy