Showing posts with label Bad Debts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bad Debts. Show all posts

Thursday, January 29, 2015

Bank's Achhe Din Are Yet To Come

Banking industry yet to see achache din: Andhra Bank chief-Hindu Business Line-30.01.2015 ( my comments given below)
Andhra Bank, the mid-size public-sector bank whose home turf is Andhra Pradesh-Telangana, has been struggling with a large-size bad loan volume. The NPA situation is so bad that some employees’ unions had gone to the extent of staging dharnas in front of the defaulters’ offices. One union now plans to march to the residence of a Telugu superstar who owes the bank ₹40 crore! At a whopping gross NPA of 6 per cent, Andhra Bank has the sixth largest bad loan stockpile among the banks and rumours have been afloat that it would be merged with Bank of Baroda or some other bank.
 
CVR Rajendran, Chairman and Managing Director, said the splitting of Andhra Pradesh had taken a huge toll on the bank’s health. In an interview with BusinessLine, Rajendran, who will be retiring soon, says achche din is yet to come to the banking industry. (My Comment : He is retiring very soon and now  only he will tell the truth, As long as one is in service he remains to be number one Yesman of Minister to survive ))
Excerpts:

When the Modi Government took over, many bank chiefs were positive that its pro-business orientation would help reduce public sector banks’ NPAs in three months. Has achche din come to the banks yet?
 
We are all a little disappointed. The government is not as quick in making economic policy changes as we had expected. Maybe, it is making long-term policies. But you must remember that the PV Narasimha Rao Government had taken all the key economic decisions in its first 100 days. These policies changed India’s economy.

As a banker, when do you expect the economy to make a turnaround?
 
My guess is, one year. There are a lot of favourable factors that can help the government take critical decisions on key economic issues. The oil price is less than a half of what it had been. The current account position is comfortable. Global attitude to India is positive. And, the government has a majority in the Lok Sabha.

You attended the Gyan Sangam of public sector banks held at Pune in the first week of January. What were the takeaways?
 
Again, a little disappointing. We made our presentations and the government listened. The Prime Minister wanted us to work towards building two-to-four global-size banks like China’s through mergers and acquisitions.
But he said the government would not push for it; and that the process should be market-driven. He is willing to listen.
 
There was an informal consensus against mergers and takeovers at the meeting. Most banks are in trouble now and no one is willing to take over weak banks and bear the additional liabilities. For the next two years, I don’t think there would be any mergers between public sector banks.

So, Andhra Bank is not going to be merged with another bank?
 
No, at least not for two years. If it remains weak after two years and even after the economy improves, maybe. We are going to work hard to retain our separate identity. Our employees are against merger. Our top priority now is to recover the bad loans.

How did your bank acquire so much NPAs?
 
A huge chunk of the NPA is from the infrastructure and power sectors. A large number of infra and power companies in the country are owned by the Telugu people and naturally, being the lead bank in the State, they had taken loans from us. Many of these companies are now in ICU (intensive care unit). Delay in government’s policy-making is one major reason for this. Of course, there are a lot of wilful defaulters too.

How did the division of Andhra Pradesh impact your bank?
 
The long agitation for a separate State of Telangana hit our business badly as 1,300 of our 2,300 branches are located in Andhra-Telangana States. It also fundamentally changed the credit culture in the region. Since political parties made competing loan waiver offers, borrowers refused to repay their loans. This affected farm and small loans most. We were the lead bank in the undivided Andhra Pradesh, now we have lost that status in Telangana (mainly because of ‘Andhra’ in the bank’s name).
 
But, in the long run, the split will benefit all the banks as well as the economy. There is going to be a feverish pace of development activities in both States because of their competitive development agendas.

What is your view of the Modi Government’s decision to split the Chairman-cum-Managing Director post in banks?
 
I support it because there is a lot of power concentrated in the hands of the CMD. The banks’ boards are not powerful in controlling the CMD.
 
However, the benefits will depend on who becomes the Chairman. If the Chairman, is corrupt he/she can collude with the CEO for their mutual benefits.
 
Also, if the Chairman’s post is created to accommodate a retired IAS officer or a ruling party politician, the situation will be worse.
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/banking/banking-industry-yet-to-see-achache-din-andhra-bank-chief/article6835351.ece

PSU banks’ NPAs rise to Rs 2.16 lakh cr-The Statesman 30.01.2015
Mumbai, 29 January: The non-performing assets of nationalised banks increased sharply from Rs 9,190 crore in 2011-2012 to Rs 2,16,739 crore in 2013-2014, according to the Reserve Bank of India.

Former journalist Mr Ketan Tirodkar obtained this data from the Central bank under the right to information.

Mr Tirodkar has filed a public interest litigation in Bombay High Court seeking a CBI investigation into what he terms “an NPA scam”.

The High Court had, in March last year, directed the CBI to inform what action it had taken against 140 cases of fraud registered by the RBI in connection with the NPAs of nationalised banks

My Comment on above news is as follows: 

This refers to quarterly result of a few PS banks booking lesser profit and greater NPA in quarter ended December 2014 compared to past quarters. Keeping in view NPA position of banks, , CMD of Andhra Bank has also expressed his opinion candidly in an interview that position of banks is not likely to improve very soon and Achhe Din are yet to come. His has to retire very soon and hence some clarity has come out.As long as top officials are in service , their one and only one duty is to please ministers willingly or unwillingly.

They promise every quarter that bank's Balance Sheet will improve from next quarter as Previous Prime Minister Mr. Manmohan Singh used to say on price rise issue. When people used to cry on rising price, he used to tell them that situation will ease from next quarter. He used to dilute the intensity of angry people by saying that economy of the country is in control and in good condition and all possible efforts are being taken to contain rising prices.

Similarly in Public sector banks, Non Performing Assets has been rising every quarter and it will continue to rise quarter after quarter. And after bad quarterly result, CMD of each bank says that bad debts will be contained from next quarter and soon they will improve.

In one quarter they somehow or the other manage the data but in next quarter they declare some bad debts. This hide and seek policy has been in play since long. In every quarter , some bank will declare bad debts and book lesser profit or loss and in next quarter some other bank will book greater profit and improvement in NPA position. This vicious circle will never end. NPA of PS banks have crossed two lac crore in March 2014 and will undoubtedly cross 5 lac crore in March 2016 if RBI does not change the policy of  NPA and that of restructuring to please Crying CMDs and to please Modi Sarkar who are building pressure for more and more lending .

In my view , no power on earth can stop rising trend in NPA  without manipulation or without changing the norms of NPA. I have been of this view for last several years and I may be termed as negative minded by extremely positive minded person or by Yesman of the system. But sooner or the later reality precipitates and surfaces out in open.

We have seen the fate of many banks in the past , not only weak banks but also so called strong banks. I do not blame United Bank or Uco Bank or Central Bank or Allahabad Bank, Indian Bank or Indian Oversea Bank. Even banks considered as strong banks like SBI, PNB, Union, Oriental bank are gradually exposing their hidden sins. A bank used to be strong not because of inherent quality asset but due to clever mind of top officials of that bank who had so many fraudulent tools to conceal bad assets quarter after quarter. This is why , many times bad result comes out only after retirement of a Clever CMD. This has happened in SBI, PNB, Union Bank, Oriental, United , Central Bank, Indian Bank , IOB , Vijya Bank and other banks so many times.

Unfortunately neither RBI nor Ministry of Finance ever took the trouble to know why and how a CMD conceals Bad debts and how another declares it after former retires . Even if some audit is carried out for doing some SHOW business, the auditors is so chosen that he or she submits favourable report or the bad report if submitted is put under carpet to save top officials of the bank who have very excellent relation with top RBI officials or politicians. System has been bad since long. It is not that a few top officials are corrupt , but the corrupt officers at top post one after other has damaged the entire system and there is none to change the system. Now corruption has become the system and the culture of the bank.  Good officers in such case avoid taking promotion or taking higher responsibility and bank thus run by mostly bad officers or inexperienced officers.

The reign of flatterers and bribe earners is not going to end as long as drastic steps are not taken to correct the culture from its source , from its origin and until  a few from each bank are punished ,irrespective of the fact that he is in service or retired. Message of good or bad governance percolates down from top and not goes up from bottom. Unfortunately for every fault of top officials or ministers , blame goes to juniors and sometimes to middle management officials who had little role either in sanction of loan or in monitoring of loan or in account turning bad.

It is bad luck that inspecting, auditing, vigilance and all Regulating agencies are birds of same feather and hence they all avoid taking any punitive action against erring officials and try to pass the time or postpone taking decision on files related to corrupt officials. Actions are taken against some officers who do not have any Godfather backing him. There is deep rooted and strong unity among bad officials in all organisations specially in banks where good officials treat it better to keep mum and remain away from mainstream.

FE Best Banks awards: When the going gets tough, these people get going-Financial Express

It was a tough year, one that most banks would not like to recall — a time when the economy had slipped into a slowdown, quality assets were scarce and more loans were turning toxic. But amidst the gloom of 2012-13, a few banks showed they could rise to the task and come through with flying colours.

And it’s to these eight banks that The Financial Express will raise a toast on Friday. Giving away the FE Best Banks awards at a glittering ceremony in the country’s financial capital will be Jayant Sinha, union minister of state for finance. Also present on the occasion will be Maharashtra chief minister Devendra Fadnavis.

The FE Best Banks awards are the most coveted in the banking space with banks vying with one another to own one. For 2012-13, HDFC Bank walked away with the prize in the new private sector banks category while Bank of Baroda (BoB) was at the top of the heap in the public sector banks category.

HDFC Bank also picked up a couple of awards for profitability and efficiency. As always, Aditya Puri, managing director, accepted the announcement with his usual equanimity. “We’re more optimistic now than ever before about the future,” Puri remarked.
Ranjan Dhawan, executive director, BoB, told FE his bank was highly honoured to be recipient of the Financial Express award.

Ravneet Gill, chief executive, Deutsche Bank, adjudged the winner among foreign banks, said he was delighted to win an award from a publication as highly admired as The Financial Express. “The award is a recognition of Deutsche Bank’s sustained and unwavering focus on clients, product innovation and principled growth,” Gill said.
Rana Kapoor, MD & CEO, Yes Bank, runner-up among new private sector banks, endorsed the prestige the survey carries with it. “Yesbankers are pleased to win this coveted recognition from The Financial Express which reinforces Yes Bank’s growing stature as a leading Indian private sector bank,” Kapoor said.

HS Upendra Kamath, MD & CEO, Tamilnad Mercantile Bank, also expressed his delight. “We are happy to receive this award from a prestigious institution like Financial Express this year as well,” Kamath said.

K Venkataraman, MD & CEO, Karur Vysya Bank, said it’s been a great honour to receive this award for the fourth year in a row. “In the tougher environment, getting continuous recognition gives satisfaction to all of us the in bank,” Venkataraman said.

The Financial Express has always taken care to ensure the survey is a fair one. Since numbers play a big part in the methodology, consultancy firm EY makes sure the weightages assigned to various parameters are relevant. Given the criteria are tough, only the very best make the cut.

Among others who rose to the challenge, this time around, are HSBC, which won for strength and soundness, BNP Paribas, which was ranked number one for credit quality, and Bank of Maharashtra, which picked up an award for growth.

Oriental Bank of Commerce Q3 net down 91.3% at Rs 19.56 crore-Businss Standard

The bank had posted net profit of Rs 224.3 crore for the October-December quarter of 2013-14
 
Public sector lender Oriental Bank of Commerce (OBC) today reported a 91.27% decline in net profit at Rs 19.56 crore for the third quarter ended December 31, 2014, dragged by higher provisions.

The bank had posted net profit of Rs 224.3 crore for the October-December quarter of 2013-14, OBC said in a BSE filing.

OBC's total income rose by 7.79% to Rs 5,458.79 crore during the October-December period from Rs 5,063.98 crore in the same period last year.

During the quarter under review, the bank's provisioning other than tax and contingencies jumped by 57.75% to Rs 885.14 crore from Rs 561.1 crore in the same quarter of the previous fiscal.

The bank's gross NPAs increased to 5.43% at the end of third quarter from 3.87% in the corresponding period in the previous year.

Shares of Oriental Bank of Commerce were trading at Rs 292.70 apiece, down 6.49% from its previous close on the BSE.


Union Bank slips on poor results-Hindu Business Line 28.01.2015
January 27, 2015:  
The stock of Union Bank of India slipped 7 per cent on Tuesday, after the company delivered disappointing results for the December quarter. The bank’s net profit fell by 13 per cent over last year, primarily driven by increase in employee cost and provisioning on bad loans.
 
The bank’s advances grew by a subdued 8.9 per cent during December, lower than the industry credit growth of 10 per cent during this period.
 
Credit growth
Aside from a slower credit growth, rise in bad loans, which is now 5 per cent of loans, up from 4.69 per cent in the September quarter, also impacted the bank's earnings. With restructured assets, another 5 per cent of loans, the bank’s stressed assets have been weighing on the bank’s capital base.
 
Union Bank of India has a tier I capital of 7.3 per cent (6.5 per cent norm) as of December 2014, stretching it thin. The return on equity is an abysmal 6.6 per cent down from about 8.3 per cent in the previous year.
 
Net interest margin
The bank’s net interest margin, which has been under pressure, is likely to face further stress as the bank lowered its base rate by 25 basis points after the RBI’s policy rate cut on Januay 15. The yield on loans is already down 10 basis points sequentially in the December quarter

PSU banks under pressure post Bank of Baroda Q3 results; CNX PSU Bank index tanks 6%

BOB, SBI, PNB, Canara Bank, Andhra Bank, Oriental Bank, Union Bank, BOI and IOB were down 4-14% on NSE


Shares of Bank of Baroda plunged 14% to Rs 186 after reporting a sharp 68% year on year (yoy) drop in net profit at Rs 334 crore for the third quarter ended December 31, 2014 (Q3), due to higher provisions for stressed loans and tax provisions.
The government-owned bank had profit of Rs 1,048 crore in a year ago quarter.

Net interest income (interest earned minus interest expended) however grew 7.5% at Rs 3,286 crore on yoy basis.

Analysts on an average had expected profit of Rs 1,329 crore on net interest income of Rs 3,626 crore for the quarter.

The provisions for bad loans increased by 66% at Rs 1,262 crore against Rs 762 crore in previous year quarter, Bank of Baroda said in a statement.

The bank’s net non performing assets (NPA) as a percentage of net advances were at 2.21% in December quarter, from 1.74% in September quarter.
Read also Government Plan for Merger of Banks and Idea Of Low Interest Regime

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Banks Are In Hurry To Sell Bad Debts

Banks put Rs 21k-cr NPAs on block in 3 months-Business Standard

Rush to offload bad loans indicates a revival in asset-sale market
Eighteen lenders, both state-run and private ones, have put Rs 21,060 crore worth of bad loans on the block in the first quarter of the financial year, indicating a revival in the asset-sale market.

The country's largest bank, State Bank of India (SBI), has identified Rs 4,288 crore of non-performing assets (NPAs) to be sold to asset reconstruction companies (ARCs), while Central Bank of India will sell Rs 3,047 crore and Bank of India Rs 2,492 crore worth of NPAs.

Apart from 15 public-sector lenders, private banks like ICICI Bank and Karur Vysya Bank are also planning to offload some of their bad loans to ARCs, though the value of the NPAs they are selling is much less than their public-sector peers.

Indian Overseas Bank (IOB) Chairman & Managing Director M Narendra says, in some cases, there is a unanimous view among consortium members on NPA sale. "So offloading accounts to ARCs early in the year can increase chances for resolution management assistance, as well as financial support. There also is a new regime for detection and resolution of stressed cases by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) which is making banks decide early." The Chennai-based lender has identified Rs 814 crore of NPAs for sale.

Possibly, this is after many years that NPA sale is being contemplated in the very first quarter of a financial year. Banks typically sell bad loans in the last quarter. However, since all banks rush to sell in the fourth quarter and are keen to complete the deals by March 31, there are chances they do not get the right price. Selling at the beginning of a year increases the possibility of fetching a good price.

Indian Bank's Association Chief Executive Officer Mohan Tanksale says many banks, after exhausting all avenues for recovery and making provisions for bad loans, are now clear that it is best to start early. "It is a calculated step and better than making a last-ditch effort at the end of a financial year. Both the seller (banks) and ARCs get more time to arrive at a fair value for assets."
Last year, SBI had sold about Rs 3,000 crore of NPAs - a significant part of that went for security receipts and some smaller accounts were sold for cash. Banks have to make marked-to-market provisions for security receipts if the amount is not realised within three years.

The stressed-asset market, where deals were few and far between in the past three-four years, got a boost after the (RBI) relaxed the norms to help banks bring down NPAs.

The central bank allowed banks to reverse the excess provision on sale of NPAs if the sale was for a value higher than the net book value to P&L account in the year the amounts were received. Further, as an incentive for early NPA sale, banks were allowed to spread any shortfall (that is, if the sale value is lower than the net book value) over a period of two years.

"Sale of assets to ARCs, at a stage when these have good chance of revival and fair amount of realisable value for rehabilitation and reconstruction, is encouraged," the central bank had said in March in its revised guidelines permitting banks to sell standard assets as well. Until last year, lenders were allowed to sell only non-performing assets; the revised guidelines came into effect from this financial year.

With the economy stuck in the slow-growth lane for two years, the stress in the system has only multiplied and hit banks' asset quality. According to rating agency Icra, public-sector banks' gross NPAs grew to 4.4 per cent as on March 31 this year from 3.6 per cent last year. The agency expects these to remain between 4.4 per cent and 4.7 per cent at the end of March 2015.
http://www.business-standard.com/article/finance/banks-put-rs-21k-cr-npas-on-block-in-3-months-114062300033_1.html

Sharp rise in NPA sales to ARCs under lens-Business Standard

ARCs have also raised their acquisition price to 60-plus per cent of book value, compared with 25 per cent historically
A sharp rise in sales of bad loans by banks to asset reconstruction companies (ARCs) has made the Reserve Bank of India put under its scanner the practices adopted by both.

The regulator suspects banks could be using the option of issuing securities receipts (SRs) to ARCs to evergreen their balance sheets. There is a spurt in the activities of ARCs, driven by banks' efforts on the latter. It calls for a closer look at the extant arrangements between ARCs and banks, RBIsaid in its financial stability report, issued on Thursday.

Foreign brokerage Credit Suisse, in its report on asset sales, said sales of non-performing loans to ARCs jumped to Rs 27,000 crore in 2013-14 from Rs 8,000 crore in FY13, and are likely to double further in FY15. However, these are being done primarily without the transfer of risk, as banks continue to hold over 90 per cent of the SRs.

ARCs have also raised their acquisition price to 60-plus per cent of book value, compared with 25 per cent historically. With ARCs earnings 1.5-2 per cent fee on the assets under management, they have been willing to incur the 5-10 per cent initial cash outflow on the inflated asset value, the brokerage said.

The share of public sector banks in the total amount of assets sold to ARCs reflects the acute stress on PSBs' asset quality and the need for prompt action, says RBI.

Most of the securitisation is happening through issuance of SRs, rather than cash. SRs might not carry the stigma of non-performing assets. Their value is mainly being derived from the collateral and not based on the record of recovery. The risk of loss of income on the asset still remains, in effect, with the originator, i.e the bank.

Any incremental value addition of ARCs in 'reconstruction' of assets, over banks' traditional skills and informational advantage needs to be assessed. Commercial banks have a significant stake in most of the ARCs operating in India and the spread of risks might not be taking place effectively, RBI added.
http://www.business-standard.com/article/finance/sharp-rise-in-npa-sales-to-arcs-under-lens-114062700094_1.html

Banks rush to dump their bad loans, make a beeline to ARCs-Economic times


MUMBAI: Lenders to Hotel Leela Venture and Bharati Shipyard have offloaded to asset reconstruction companies (ARCs) the loans that turned bad last year, a move which signifies that the banks are in a hurry to clean up their books instead of waiting to recover their dues through a long-winded legal procedure.

In two separate deals, banks led by the State Bank of India have agreed to sell the Rs 4,300 crore loan of Hotel Leela Venture to JM Finanical ARC and Rs 8,000 crore outstanding loan of Bharati Shipyard to Edelweiss ARC.
Two bank officials who confirmed these deals said the lenders for the first time jointly decided to sell loans as a single block to a single ARC. "All lenders unanimously agreed to sell the loan at a cut-off price decided by the lead bank, the State Bank of India," said a bank official, who did not wish to be identified.
Siby Antony, managing director and chief executive of Edelweiss ARC, said, "It is not our policy to give any information about specific cases." Officials of JM Financial ARC did not respond to an e-mail query by ET.
Significantly, for the first time, the loans extended to Hotel Leela Venture were sold at a price higher than the outstanding loans. In the past, lenders have had to take a haircut of 50-95% of the outstanding amount while selling the bad loan to ARCs. Lenders including Life Insurance Corporation of India have extended a loan of Rs 4,000 crore to Hotel Leela Venture, against the bid of Rs 4,300 crore, executives familiar with the matter said.
About 5% of the amount will be paid in cash while the remaining sum, in the form of security receipts which would be paid over a period of time, will be linked to recovery of the dues by the ARCs. Bharati Shipyard, which was struggling to receive lenders' consent to restructure its loan under the corporate debt restructuring (CDR) route, was sold at a little less than Rs 3,000 crore, including a combination of cash and security receipts.
The loan given to Hotel Leela Venture turned bad after the borrower failed to infuse Rs 2,000 crore into the business - a precondition laid by the lenders when they restructured the loan about two years ago. In recent months, promoters of Leela Venture were in negotiation for Rs 2,000 crore mezzanine loan from private equity firm KKR that would have involved mortgaging two of its properties in Chennai and Delhi for the amount. However, as the loan turned bad, and the lenders decided to offload it.
KKR had made a joint bid with an ARC firm to acquire the loans of Leela, but JM Financial ARC made a better offer, a person privy to the details said. Increasing stress on the loan book has been worrying bankers as it eats into their profits and limits their ability to expand the loan book. As a result, a number of banks are selling stressed loans to ARCs.
Data released by the Reserve Bank of India show that for commercial banks, gross non-performing assets (NPA) - bad loans before making provisions - stood at 4% of total advances in March compared with 3.4% in the yearago period. According to Icra, NPAs were the highest for public sector banks, at Rs 2,27,300 crore in March, against Rs 1,64,500 crore a year ago.
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-06-30/news/50974290_1_arcs-loan-bharati-shipyard

Friday, June 20, 2014

Banks NOt Eligible For Investment

State Bank of India among 24 public sector banks ineligible for Rs 50,000 crore  EPFO investments-Economic Times


NEW DELHI: With non-performing assets on the rise, the country's largest bank —
State Bank of India along with 23 other government-owned banks,  are no longer eligible for investments worth Rs 50,000 crore made in bank  deposits each year by the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation, the country's  largest retirement fund.

The Employees' Provident Fund Organisation  (EPFO), which manages over Rs 6,00,000 crore of retirement savings entrusted to  it mandatorily by 8.15 crore employees, can no longer invest in the bonds and deposit  instruments of these banks as their bad loan levels have breached its internal
threshold to define 'safe' investments.

As many as 24 of the 29 public sector  banks have net non-performing assets of over 2% of their net advances,  disqualifying them from lucrative and predictable inflows from the PF department. These include large lenders like Punjab National Bank and the Union Bank of India.

"As per the investment guidelines for  provident fund savings, the EPFO can now only invest in term deposits of five  public sector banks — Bank of Baroda, Canara Bank, Syndicate Bank,  Vijaya Bank and Bank of India," said a senior government  official. "These five banks are not the biggest, but their bad loans are still below the the threshold limits set by the board," he said.

With the economy shrinking  for two years running, coinciding with a sharp contraction in manufacturing and  mining output, the spectre of bad loans has got worse across the banking sector  in 2013-14, with 36 banks reporting gross NPAs of Rs 2,34,014 crore, 36% higher
than a year ago.

The surge in bad bank loans has become a headache for  the EPFO which, till last year, had parked over Rs 1.5 lakh crore in public  sector fina ..






 







 

 

 

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Bankers Want National Asset Management Company

Bankers meet Jaitley, pitch for National Asset Management Company-Indian Express (My Opinion Below)

Rising bad loans was the top priority of bankers who met finance minister Arun Jaitley for a pre-Budget meeting on Tuesday and called for the setting up of a National Asset Management Company to deal with the problem.
“There were some suggestions on setting up of National Asset Management Company,” said financial services secretary GS Sandhu after the meeting, adding that the government will examine all suggestions. According to the proposal, the National Asset Management Company will act as a nodal agency and take over large non-performing assets of banks and help in revive companies ridden with bad debts.
The gross non-performing assets (NPA) of public sector banks rose to Rs 2.03 lakh crore at the end of September 2013, from Rs 1.55 lakh crore on 31 March, 2013.
“There was discussion on NPA. There was also proposal for setting up of National Asset Management Company for improving the performance of DRTs (debt recovery tribunals) to collect loans,” said Naina Lal Kidwai, HSBC India country head.
Seeking cooperation from banks, Jaitley said, “The slow down of economic growth coupled with high inflationary pressure poses a challenge to the economic environment.” Public sector banks also sought capital infusion and development of long term instruments for financing the infrastructure sector.
Meanwhile, Kotak Mahindra Bank managing director Uday Kotak said the government should consider listing of LIC. “I am not saying it needs to be necessarily done in the July Budget … But over the next few years the government should consider listing of LIC,” he said.

My opinion: Reasons Behind Rise In Bad Debts In Banks

In my opinion establishment of National Asset Management Company (NAMC) can do nothing to cure the sickness caused by bad debts. It may simply transfer the bad debts from traditional banks to proposed NAMC or Asset Management Company called as ARC. Government may force banks to sell bad debts at heavy discounts which will ultimately cause loss to none other than investors and depositors . Because any erosion in profit of public sector bank may reduce the capacity of banks to pay higher interest rate on deposits and reduce the capacity of banks to pay higher dividends to investors.  

If Modi government is really interested to improve the health of public sector banks , they will have to strike at the root of bank management , i.e to ensure judicious promotion opportunity to all , time bound promotion, end of flattery based promotion, end of bribe based recruitment and promotions, end of posting based on recommendation of powerful officers etc.They will have to modify the corrupt system not only in banks , but also in judiciary, police department, administration etc too.


Lacs of cases against defaulters of the bank and against NPA borrowers have been filed in various local courts, district courts, Lok Adalats, Ombudsmen, High courts, Supreme court, Debt recovery Tribunals, District Certificate Officers, District magistrate’s court , Sub Divisional Magistrate’ court for taking possession of property seized under SERFAECI act etc have been filed by various financial institutes including public sector banks but due to manpower shortage or due to inefficiency of executives, or due to malicious intention of magistrates and judges, or due to conspiracy of advocates in nexus with judges and magistrates cases are lying pending for years together.



Is there any provision to take action against judges who in nexus with advocates are willfully delaying the process of justice?

If yes, has any government taken any against any corrupt judges in the past which could demonstrate the effectiveness of the Law and willingness of rulers to punish the corrupt judges before it is too late?

Has any of the government taken any drastic step to reduce pendency in courts and to expedite award of justice?

What action government has taken against the judiciary and advocates in recovering the money of banks which have been locked in willful defaulters of the bank?



It is observed that banks have granted loan against fake deed of landed property or financed to many firms against the collateral or prime security of same laded property.

Have government punished any of Sub registrars or deed writer or bankers who worked with negligence and malicious intention?



Banks sanction new loans and advances on the strength of prime of collateral security valued by approved valuers or government recognized valuers. But if these valuers give inflated value of any property after taking extraordinary service charges from loan seeker or with some vested interest or with malicious intention and in turn jeopardize the loan disbursed by banks, what remedial recourse lies with bankers or the government. Bankers at most remove the name of such valuers from their panel or the government blacklist such valuers.

Is there any provision to punish such valuers?

If yes, has any authority or any bankers have ever punished such unscrupulous valuers?

It is observed that Chartered Accountants blindly sign on balance sheets or financial reports of banks and borrowers, companies and firms if they are given attractive amount of money as service charges. These CA while conducting statutory audits of various banks more often than not ,simply put their seal and signature and take attractive fees and charges from banks. Wage without work is the suitable slogan of CAs.



It is also true that CAs have to complete audit of two to three branches in a period of five to six days and hence they can neither make honest and through scrutiny of records of branch of the bank they are asked to audit by RBI nor they have the will to do so because there is no deterrent action if they prefer not to do their duty honestly.

Have government taken any action against any of CAs in the past 60 years which could teach a lesson to team of CA?

Have government pondered over the real need of time period to make a serious scrutiny of balance sheet of a branch?

Or it is planned diplomacy of clever bankers to give minimum time to CA or for that matter any inquiry or vigilance officer so that he comes under pressure and sign the financial papers hurriedly ignoring the faults and mistakes.

Due to sheer negligence and malicious intention of the controlling, monitoring and regulating officials .Chartered Accountants in India have become habituated to claim gift, bribe, grand hospitality and all out of pocket expenses to sign a balance sheet , which may be right or wrong, true or false, actual or inflated. It is only a few stray cases where CAs are greedy and bank officials are dry honest and simple hearted that some of the irregularities are reported in audit report.



It is worthwhile to mention here evil deeds of owner of Satyam Computers was not detected by team of Chartered Accountants and similarly less provisioning made by public sector banks including SBI towards their regular liabilities such as pension, gratuity, NPA was also not detected by team of CAs who use to audit the bank year after year.



Similarly there are advocates who give legal opinion blindly and cause huge loss to banks who on the basis of favourable legal reports and search reports sanction loans to loan seekers and who ultimately become victim of negligence and malicious intention of the advocates. RBI knows very well that huge amount of banks have become irrecoverable only due to multiple financing on same landed property or due to financing on fake deed or due to wrongful and unlawful sale of property already mortgaged to some bank for taking loan.



Have Government taken action against any advocate or any sub registrar or Any Deed writer or any officials due to whose fault banks had to suffer huge loss?

Never ,,, Never because none of government department and offices really want to work especially top ranked officers who are busy in passing the time and retire . Officials in all offices and departments usually remain in search of some clients who can offer attractive bribe in cash or in kind or some precious gifts in lieu of service he extends.



Bank officials who sanction credit after taking bribe are able to please their bosses and ensure their timely and unusual promotion and get choice posting. Honest and intelligent officers are sidelined and posted at critical place or remote rural centers so that their voice against evil work may be stopped. Good officers are denied their promotion in time and juniors are given change after taking bribe. Has government ever tried to stop such bribe based promotions and transfers. Not only this even direct recruitment of officers in various scales is also undertaken by bank officials to earn bribe , campus recruitment is allowed in a college based on whims of some senior officers to give favour to his own boys and girls , of his own community. Not only in banks but top ranked officials of all state governments and central government resort to mass transfer and earn money in lieu of giving favour to staff who desire choice posting and timely promotions.



Police officers do not lodge FIR in their registers, do not execute warrants issued against VIPs by various courts ,do not question criminals but tortures the person who wish to lodge complaint against criminals , defaulters and law breakers.



Has government taken any step in last 60 years to change the system and procedure of police department which give them unrestricted powers and which tempts them to take whimsical decisions and arbitrary action against honest and true citizens?



Hundreds of cases filed against corrupt officers related to misuse of power, fraudulent activities, bribe led lending, lack of monitoring, negligence of duty, favour to dishonest contractors, passing of bills of unscrupulous suppliers, passing of fake bills or inflated bills either lie pending for disposal for years together in the office of Vigilance office, CBI,Anti Corruption bureau, or Human resource department for decisive action against erring officers or such files are closed acquitting erring officials . New trend has developed in government offices to burn the loss of files related to corruption of high profile officers. File are made untraceable or declared lost.

Why?

Is there any mechanism or tool in the rule book or almirah of the government to prevent such malpractices which frequently and recurrently occur almost in all offices, departments and Secretariats of various Ministries?



Political stalwarts spread propaganda that loans of poor farmers or big businessmen will be waived by the government or by the bank .Such ill motivated propaganda ultimately vitiates the atmosphere of recovery. Government announces waiver scheme from time to time for electoral gain. 

As a result borrowers of the bank willfully default in repayment of bank loan. Quantum of Non Performing Assets known as bad assets in public domain continues to rise year after year in all public sector banks. Then process of compromise and write off starts at bank level and again there is unhealthy transaction of money between bankers and borrowers or between brokers and officers who decides to sanction sacrifice loan amount. Ultimately culture of non-re payment of loan by borrowers back to banks takes the root and bankers have to suffer huge loss due to high provisioning and due to rising NPA. For this purpose bank officials , union leaders and politicians all are friends and relatives of each other.



Government has not courage, no will, no effective tools to punish bad politicians because government is made of such corrupt politicians only. Government has no courage to punish kith and kin of powerful politicians and bureaucrats who have willfully defaulted in repayment of bank loans and payment of tax dues or other charges due to government.