Arcil recovers just a fifth of bad loans Over the last 4
years, Arcil has been able to redeem only 15-20% of security receipts issued,
says official Vishwanath Nair-Livemint
Mumbai: India’s first and largest bad loan restructuring firm, Asset Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd (Arcil), has recovered or written off just a fifth of the loans it bought from banks in the last four years, in another fallout of the economic downturn that has increased stress on the banking system. Arcil issues so-called security receipts to banks for taking non-performing loans (NPLs) off their books.
Mumbai: India’s first and largest bad loan restructuring firm, Asset Reconstruction Co. (India) Ltd (Arcil), has recovered or written off just a fifth of the loans it bought from banks in the last four years, in another fallout of the economic downturn that has increased stress on the banking system. Arcil issues so-called security receipts to banks for taking non-performing loans (NPLs) off their books.
When a bank sells an NPL, the
asset moves out of its loan book and is classified as a standard investment
against the security receipts, freeing it from provisioning requirements. “Over
the last four years, Arcil has been able to redeem only 15-20% of the security
receipts issued by it,” said an official at one of the institutional investors
in the company.
While Arcil does not put out this data publicly, its filings
with the Registrar of Companies (RoC) show that for the financial year ended 31
March 2013, it had security receipts worth Rs.5,564 crore outstanding. Of this,
receipts worth Rs.1,204 crore, or 22%, were either written off or redeemed.
A
break-up of the amount written off was not provided. In fiscal 2012, 15% of
outstanding receipts were written off or redeemed and in fiscal 2011, this
number stood at 24%, the RoC filing showed. “As the economy is experiencing a
downward trend, it is increasingly impacting the recovery and resolution efforts
of the company,” Arcil said in its balance sheet for 2012-13. An email sent to
Arcil on Friday, requesting more details about the company’s financials,
remained unanswered as of press time on Monday.
Foreign investors, such as
South African lender Firstrand Bank and Barclays Plc., that have been looking
to exit Arcil, are yet to find buyers, said a senior official at Arcil who did
not wish to be identified. Mint reported in January 2013 that Firstrand Bank is
looking to sell its 4.11% stake in Arcil, which it had bought from ICICI Bank
Ltd in 2007 for about Rs.40 crore.
Barclays owns a 1.5% stake in it. State Bank
of India is the largest shareholder in the firm with a 19.95% stake; IDBI Bank
Ltd owns 19.18% and ICICI Bank 13.26%. The weak show by India’s largest asset
reconstruction company (ARC) highlights the hurdles faced by such firms in
recovering bad loans.
The sale of bad loans to ARCs rose last year as banks
tried to keep their reported non-performing assets (NPAs) in check and cut
provisions against such assets. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has also been
encouraging ARCs to play a larger role in the resolution of stressed assets in
the financial sector. As of 31 March 2014, the gross NPAs of 40 listed banks
was Rs.2.42 trillion, up 34.4% from Rs.1.8 trillion in the year-ago period.
The
track record of the ARC industry, so far, has not been very encouraging, say
analysts. A 7 August report by Crisil Ltd put the redemption ratio of
securities receipts for the entire industry at 53% over the last 10 years.
Redemption ratio is the ratio between security receipts redeemed and the
receipts issued by the asset reconstruction industry.
“Our observation has been
that in cases where at least three years have elapsed post issue of security
receipts, average recovery has been over 50% of security receipt face value,”
said Kalpesh Gada, head-structured finance at credit rating agency ICRA Ltd.
According to Pawan Agarwal, senior director, Crisil Ratings, a majority of
these redemptions have come from the top four ARCs including Arcil, Edelweiss
ARC, JM Financial ARC and Phoenix ARC.
“This recovery by the ARC industry has
not been up to its potential. One of the reasons why the recoveries have not
been up to the mark is the age of the NPAs sold by banks. The average age of
the NPAs sold by banks till some time back was five years. The more you delay
selling the asset, the lesser the value which can be recovered from it,” he
said.
In January, RBI, as part of its stressed assets framework, had encouraged
banks to sell bad loans to ARCs earlier in the cycle. This, according to the
RBI, would allow ARCs to play a larger role in reviving an asset rather than
just focusing on recoveries.
Another important reason for low recoveries by
ARCs is the time required to aggregate the debt in case of multiple lenders. It
can take between 18-30 months for an ARC to aggregate the debt which leads to
more delays in recovery and reduction in value of the assets, analysts said.
Both issues have now been addressed by the industry and the regulator, Agrawal
of Crisil said: the average age of stressed assets being sold to ARCs has come
down to two years; the time for debt aggregation is also being reduced with
banks selling bad assets as a consortium rather than individually.
But ARCs continue
to struggle with legal delays in the recovery process. In his budget speech on
10 July, finance minister Arun Jaitley had raised concerns regarding the
increasing NPAs in public sector banks and announced the setting up of six new
debt recovery tribunals (DRTs) in Chandigarh, Bangalore, Ernakulum, Dehradun,
Siliguri and Hyderabad. DRTs are specialised courts focusing only on debt
recovery for banks, while also resolving cases involving borrowers, guarantors
or any one aggrieved by a bank.
Now, there are 33 DRTs and five debt recovery
appellate tribunals (DRATs), in India. Meanwhile, the department of financial
services of the finance ministry has set up a panel to suggest amendments in
debt recovery laws and make them more effective, PTI reported on 30 July. “The
whole asset restructuring landscape needs to be thought through in a broader
framework to achieve asset resolution in a timely way and value creation for
ARCs, lenders and investors.
Bankruptcy laws, powers available to ARCs and
turnaround funds, dispute resolution, etc. need to be thought through in a
holistic way so that the landscape attracts the right pools of capital,
turnaround management expertise and foreign investment into special situation
and restructuring funds,” said Vikram Limaye, chief executive and managing
director, IDFC Ltd.
No comments:
Post a Comment