MUMBAI: The country's largest lender, SBI has said that public sector banks should be given an opportunity to tap the best talent from premier institutes like IITs and IIMs.
"The public money goes into formation of the institutions like IITs and IIMs. From all of these good institutions, which nurture the best talents of the country, the public sector banks are barred from recruitment," SBI chairperson Arundhati Bhattacharya said at a recent event.
She said currently the Supreme Court does not allow state-run banks to go for campus recruitment to these premier institutions as every vacancy has to be advertised so that everyone should be able to participate in it.
"Now, what kind of a country actually spends tax payers money and then stops the public sector banks from taking talents from these institutions," she said.
She further said that by not allowing public sector banks to recruit from IITs and IIMs, it is creating a barrier and does not give them a level-playing field.
"If without this the public sector has delivered so much then imagine what we will deliver if we are allowed...," she added.
SBI ने कहा, सरकारी बैंकों को IIT-IIM से रिक्रूटमेंट की अनुमति हो-Aaajtak-02.02.2015
देश के सबसे बड़े भारतीय स्टेट बैंक ने कहा है कि सार्वजनिक क्षेत्र के बैंकों को भारतीय प्रौद्योगिकी संस्थानों (आईआईटी) और भारतीय प्रबंधन संस्थानों (आईआईएम) से रिक्रूटमेंट का मौका मिलना चाहिए.
एसबीआई की चेयरपर्सन अरंधति भट्टाचार्य ने हाल में एक कार्यक्रम में कहा, ‘आईआईटी और आईआईएम जैसे संस्थानों में जनता का पैसा लगा है, इन सभी संस्थानों से सार्वजनिक क्षेत्र के बैंकों को रिक्रूटमेंट का अधिकार नहीं है.’’ उन्होंने कहा कि फिलहाल उच्चतम न्यायालय सरकारी बैंकों को कैंपस नियुक्ति की अनुमति नहीं देता, क्योंकि उनके लिए प्रत्येक वैकेंसी के लिए विज्ञापन निकालना जरूरी है.
उन्होंने कहा, ‘वास्तव में इन संस्थानों पर करदाताओं का पैसा लगाया जाता है और उसके बाद सार्वजनिक क्षेत्र के बैंकों की इनकी प्रतिभाओं की रिक्रूटमेंट से रोका जाता है.’
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
High Court Says Campus Hiring By Banks is Illegal and Unconstitutional
This refers to Mumbai High court judgement pronounced Today in a case related to Central Bank of India . The Bombay high court on Tuesday held that its ( bank’s ) recruitment policy, which allows campus recruitment/interview method for appointment of officers against permanent vacancies on regular basis, was illegal and unconstitutional.
Bank management of almost all public sector banks has resorted to campus hiring, not only in scale I but in scale II and scale III too. During last ten years top ranked officers of almost all banks have functioned in an arbitrary manner, recruited persons of their choice, giving favours to kith and kins of high profile persons and denying the talented unemployed youth. Recruitment of persons for some personal gain or to give favour to sons and daughters of known dignitaries has damaged work culture in banks and adversely affected the asset quality of almost all banks.
Top management in public sector banks picked up persons from campus of their choice and in the name of merit they raped those who have been working in the bank for years and decades. Not only in recruitment have they harmed the future of those existing employees who were waiting for promotion to higher cadre and higher scale. There are instances where bank management recruited officer directly in scale III whereas hundreds and thousands of officers eligible for promotion to scale III are denied their rights.
Further due to their arbitrary and unjustified recruitment of officers from campus in scale III or scale II management of bank had to pay double salary or more for the same work which could be and which hitherto has been performed by junior officers and clerks.
Is there anyone who can punish such top ranked officers whose faulty action caused huge loss to the bank??
Why these responsible and top ranked officers should not be personally punished and taken to task so that in near future no one dares violating the rights of existing employees and denying the opportunity to really talented youths.
I am unable to understand why the courts have simply warned the bank to desist from campus hiring in future and why not court thought it necessary to impose penalty of erring top officials.
In response to court verdict against Central bank and its clear warning to bank not to repeat such campus hiring, Government of India should order CBI inquiry into all recruitment which took place during last ten years in public sector banks through campus hiring and whether those officers are really better than already working officers in banks and whether there was any corrupt dealing in such type of recruitment.
Central Bank’s campus hiring illegal: HC
Times of India
MUMBAI: In a major setback for Central Bank of India, the Bombay high court on Tuesday held that its recruitment policy, which allows campus recruitment/interview method for appointment of officers against permanent vacancies on regular basis, was illegal and unconstitutional.
The HC directed the bank to refrain from making any appointments against permanent vacancies on regular basis via campus recruitment\interview mechanism, warning that if it did so, it would be non-est (not binding) in law.
A division bench comprising Justices A M Khanvilkar and Mridula Bhatkar directed the bank to refrain from making any appointment against permanent vacancies on regular basis via campus recruitment\interview mechanism, warning that if it did so, it would be non-est (not binding) in law. "We hold that in the matter of public employment, as per constitutional scheme, the mandate is to invite applications from all eligible persons by giving wide publicity, without exception. The fact that other state instrumentalities have resorted to campus interview mode of appointment in the past can be no basis to legitimize that process which inevitably tramples the fundamental rights of otherwise qualified and eligible citizens to be considered for the public posts along with similarly placed persons,'' the court said.
Further, it pointed out that the argument of liberalization, autonomy or competition with private sector, tapping of candidates from specialized field or better qualified candidates through campus recruitment could be no basis to uphold the impugned action of the bank. "The successive pronouncements of the apex court have affirmed that in matter of public employment, it should be done only by inviting applications from the public at large by giving wide publicity and issuing public advertisements,'' the HC said, refusing to buy the argument that candidates selected through campus interview were a class apart and utilizing their expertise could help compete and match the performances of private and foreign banks.
A section of PG management students had filed a writ petition challenging the recruitment policy of Central Bank, saying it was against constitutional provisions and should be quashed. They wanted the court to direct the bank to issue an advertisement to ensure a transparent recruitment process.
The bank submitted that recruitment through campus interview was a well-known method and was permitted as per its recruitment and promotion policy. It further contended that the method helps identify and select the best talent.
The petitioners brought to the notice of the court that most of the colleges from where students were recruited were private institutions, giving credence to the theory of the possibility of pick-and-choose approach adopted in the empanelment of the stated colleges\institutions.
The HC directed the bank to refrain from making any appointments against permanent vacancies on regular basis via campus recruitment\interview mechanism, warning that if it did so, it would be non-est (not binding) in law.
A division bench comprising Justices A M Khanvilkar and Mridula Bhatkar directed the bank to refrain from making any appointment against permanent vacancies on regular basis via campus recruitment\interview mechanism, warning that if it did so, it would be non-est (not binding) in law. "We hold that in the matter of public employment, as per constitutional scheme, the mandate is to invite applications from all eligible persons by giving wide publicity, without exception. The fact that other state instrumentalities have resorted to campus interview mode of appointment in the past can be no basis to legitimize that process which inevitably tramples the fundamental rights of otherwise qualified and eligible citizens to be considered for the public posts along with similarly placed persons,'' the court said.
Further, it pointed out that the argument of liberalization, autonomy or competition with private sector, tapping of candidates from specialized field or better qualified candidates through campus recruitment could be no basis to uphold the impugned action of the bank. "The successive pronouncements of the apex court have affirmed that in matter of public employment, it should be done only by inviting applications from the public at large by giving wide publicity and issuing public advertisements,'' the HC said, refusing to buy the argument that candidates selected through campus interview were a class apart and utilizing their expertise could help compete and match the performances of private and foreign banks.
A section of PG management students had filed a writ petition challenging the recruitment policy of Central Bank, saying it was against constitutional provisions and should be quashed. They wanted the court to direct the bank to issue an advertisement to ensure a transparent recruitment process.
The bank submitted that recruitment through campus interview was a well-known method and was permitted as per its recruitment and promotion policy. It further contended that the method helps identify and select the best talent.
The petitioners brought to the notice of the court that most of the colleges from where students were recruited were private institutions, giving credence to the theory of the possibility of pick-and-choose approach adopted in the empanelment of the stated colleges\institutions.
why-banks-want-appeal-in-supreme-court
Private sector banks like ICICI, Axis and HDFC bank have been performing better than Public Sector Banks (PSB) mainly due to their better HR management. They resort to private/campus recruitments to attract talent. The new recruits do not enter the banks with the legacies prevailing. They come with new ideas and show mu h higher risk taking capacities. They do not shirk their responsibilities and take bedt decisions according to their capabilities. Here, knowledge counts more than mere experience. According to me, avoiding decisonmaking by people in key positions has landed PSBs in todays grim situation. Promoting people with mere experience but without ability to take proper decisions has resulted into the current mess in these banks.
ReplyDeletePrivate sector banks like ICICI, Axis and HDFC bank have been performing better than Public Sector Banks (PSB) mainly due to their better HR management. They resort to private/campus recruitments to attract talent. The new recruits do not enter the banks with the legacies prevailing. They come with new ideas and show mu h higher risk taking capacities. They do not shirk their responsibilities and take bedt decisions according to their capabilities. Here, knowledge counts more than mere experience. According to me, avoiding decisonmaking by people in key positions has landed PSBs in todays grim situation. Promoting people with mere experience but without ability to take proper decisions has resulted into the current mess in these banks.
ReplyDelete